Archive for March, 2011


Tomorrow is the 1st of April.  To some, this day comes as just another fab Friday…but to others, it’s one of the most awaited and anticipated days of the year.

April Fools’ Day has been around for longer than you think. In fact, the annual day of foolishness was first mentioned in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales in 1932.  Since then, much of the world has taken part in the silliness that this day brings.  Some countries celebrate the day quite differently than others.  For instance, some countries like New Zealand and Ireland only celebrate April Fools’ until noon, whereas in other countries the jokes are played throughout the entirety of the day.

So whether you are the veteran prankster or the innocent victim, share with us some of your best, funniest, most clever April Fools’ jokes or stories down below.  We’d love to hear them!

Post submitted by: Crystal Maranan

“The devil is in the details”

PROVERB

MEANING:  Even the grandest project depends on the success of the smallest components.  This version of the proverb often implies that the details might cause failure.  A more positive version is “God is in the details,” a saying often attributed to the architect Le Corbusier.

Daily Word: crucial

crucial
adjective

1. involving an extremely important decision or result; decisive; critical : a crucial experiment
2. severe; trying
3. of the form of a cross; cross-shaped

SYNONYMS: momentous, vital, essential, significant

“Be there or be square”

IDIOM

MEANING: Attend or be at some event or place or be considered uncooperative or not “with it.”

EXAMPLE: There’s a bunch of people going to be at John’s on Saturday.  Be there or be square.

Daily Word: rectify

rectify
verb
1. put (something) right; correct : mistakes made now cannot be rectified later | efforts to rectify the situation.
2. convert (alternating current) to direct current
3. find a straight line equal in length to (a curve)

SYNONYMS: correct, right, put right, put to rights

“The president should immediately return homeand call Congress back into session so that this action can be fully debated,” said [Representative Candice Miller)  in a statement.”

For those who are unfamiliar with the current situation in Libya,  Obama decided to take military action in Libya for “humanitarian purposes.”  However, the controversy that has risen is  two-fold: whether or not Obama plans on removing Qaddafi, Libya’s dictator and whether or not we should be there in the first place–considering that he never notified Congress; he just went to Libya.

The below article shows the dissension that President Obama’s decision has caused within the liberal and Democratic communities. It taught me, personally, that just because a person identifies with a certain political party does not mean:  1) that person, in the case of President Obama, always follow the ideology (if he did, he would be less inclined to initiate war) or  2) that the main political figures of that party agree with the President’s impactful decisions.

For further information, I would suggest browsing different types of newspaper coverage of the issue in order to get a more objective view of what the Libya situation entails; however, what first grabbed my attention regarding this issue was Fox News’ coverage of Louis Farrakhan’s unsettling disagreement with Obama in an interview he participated in.

See this link for details:

Post submitted by Casey O’Neill

A sixteen-year old acne-prone version of me loved Morrissey. In interviews, Moz eloquently explained his refusal to eat animal flesh by setting up a picture of the world as a family. For his picture, animals are helpless in many ways. A young chicken cannot necessarily say “stop hurting me” in a language that we could readily understand. A pig cannot say “feed me” in our language, either. Maybe the pig could oink or use her body to nudge us toward the refrigerator, but she lacks the language that we value. Similarly, Morrissey thinks, babies are helpless. Babies are absolutely dependent on our actions for survival. We must create food, shelter, change the room temperature and give them milk bottles. Sure, my baby niece can cry, grab fruits off of trees and bite cups. However, she cannot survive without me passing on some survival methodology. We listen to the niece but we do not listen to the helpless animals, the babies in the worlds’ family.

Definitely not a new argument. Yet, in my teen angst I adopted Morrisey’s argument for veganism. I was vegan for most of my high school experience. While many are healthy vegans, I ate a lot of French fries and tortillas. It’s expensive being vegan, in case you haven’t been to a vegan restaurant before. Consequently, during perhaps the most important physical development stage of my life, I lacked the nutrients conducive to being a healthy woman. This is why I ended up quitting the vegan life and transitioned into vegetrainism, pescatarianism and five years later, I eat all kinds of meat. Not just burgers and chicken nuggets, but I have experimented in all types of animal flesh—seared, raw, barbequed, sautéed, burnt, you get the point. Why?

After reading chapter seventeen of Michael Pollan’s “The Omnivore’s Dilemma,” the reasons why I eat meat now have not gotten anymore complex. Pollan explains how averse humans are to realizing the violence of animal slaughter and uses Peter Singer’s work to show why eating animals can be deemed morally wrong. Singer and my teen understanding of Morrissey are strikingly familiar. Both Singer and Morrissey show that eating animal meat is morally wrong and the underlying premise relies on the assumption that we value equality and unity. Does it sound like I’m going in circles? It’s because I am. I do not believe the debate about eating animals is a moral one. For me, it is obvious that eating animals is morally wrong. However, whether or not I care to act morally in response to that changes from time to time. Driving in cars that omit gas that is killing our environment and hurting people who may never be guilty of selfishly using gas cars to get to work is morally wrong. People who are responsibly bicycling to work must still suffer from the chemicals that my car emits. It’s morally wrong. Do I care? No, because I want to get to work faster and it may be safer for me. So yes, omnivorism is wrong. But no, the cost and benefits do not lead me to feel compelled to stop. The omnivore’s dilemma is therefore not a moral one (I know it’s morally wrong) but a pragmatic one.

Posted by: Tiffany

Edwidge Danticat is one of the most talented authors that I have been blessed to encounter. Her “Krik? Krak!” explores what it means to be an immigrant woman, travel between two worlds, and how to love through a collection of compelling short stories. Danticat’s honest voice and ability to show how suffering and compassion know no boundaries make her work a must-read!

 

 

 

 

Posted by: Tiffany

Daily Word: transcend

transcend
verb
be or go beyond the range of limits of (something abstract, typically a conceptual field or division) : this was an issue transcending party politics.

  • surpass (a person or an achievement)

SYNONYMS: go beyond, rise above, cut across; surpass, exceed, beat, cap, tower above

“The whole nine yards”

IDIOM

MEANING: The whole of something, including everything that is connected with it.

EXAMPLE: When I eat Mexican food, I like to have fajitas, bean dip, guacamole – the whole nine yards.

When analyzing a text, it is important to close read.  Close reading is the act of breaking down specific passages in a text to its component parts.  Rather than focusing on the whole, close reading focuses on a few sections of a short story or novel.  However, short poems are usually close read in their entirety.  Here are some tips for becoming more effective at close reading.

1) Choose a passage that is rich in visceral imagery and literary elements.  Furthermore, the passage should be significant to the text as a whole (if you cannot make that argument, than you have not chosen a passage that is important enough to close read).  The key is to make the process smoother for yourself–choose a passage that will yield strong analysis.

2) Read the passage once over to get a feel for it.  Re-read the passage, but this time begin underlining words, phrases, and sentences that stand out to you.  Don’t think too much (yet) about why these words, phrases, sentences stand out to you–simply go with your gut feeling.

3) Now it’s time to apply your critical thinking skills.  Think about why you underlined the words, phrases, and sentences you underlined.  Why did the word, phrase, or sentence stand out to you?  When analyzing, think about the 5 senses: sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch.  How does the word, phrase, or sentence you are analyzing impact one or more of the senses?

4) Now think about how the author was able to impact your senses.  What literary tools did the author utilize?  This can include imagery, description, syntax, diction, tone, etc.

Those are just a few introductory tools; eventually, each writer will find his/her own style/tools for close reading.

Post Submitted By: Layhannara Tep

“This is the life!”

IDIOM

MEANING: Something you say when you are relaxing and very much enjoying the fact that you are not at work.

EXAMPLE: Sun, sand and cocktails – this is the life!

Daily Word: apparition

apparition
noun
a ghost or ghostlike image of a person

  • the appearance of something remarkable or unexpected, typically an image of this type : twentieth century apparitions of the Virgin.

SYNONYMS: ghost, phantom, specter, spirit

“Ace in the hole”

IDIOM

MEANING: A hidden advantage or resource kept in reserve until needed: “The coach was certain that his new trick play would turn out to be his ace in the hole.”

This term comes from the game of stud poker,  in which one or more cards are turned face down, or “in the hole,” as bets are placed.  The ace is the card with the highest value.

Two time National Poetry Slam Champion, Beau Sia, writes and performs an excellent persona poem in the voice of Alexandra Wallace (in response to recent racist  video).

His video is clever, insightful, heartfelt and most of all—hits at the universal core of our own humanity. Must watch!

–Post submitted by Sahra

Daily Word: vicarious

vicarious

adjective

1. 

performed, exercised, received, or suffered in place of another
2. 

taking the place of another person or thing; acting or serving as a substitute.
3. 

felt or enjoyed through imagined participation in the experience of others: a vicarious thrill.

Hi everyone!  Our blog is going on a short hiatus as students go on Spring Break.  We will resume all blogging duties on Monday, March 28th , 2011!!  In the mean time, click any of the pages above to catch up on old posts—videos, essays, articles, and more! :)   See you all soon! Thank you for reading!

Apparently, some people think so:

We support free speech, yes!  But these comments are downright disturbing.  The sentiments are extremely hateful and violent.  Not that we should ever equate a natural disaster as deserving for past crimes, but have people forgotten that the United States nuked 2 major cities in Japan?  In the vein of above comments, would that mean that the U.S. should expect some form of mass destruction as “payback”?  The logic is simply inconceivable.  At the end of the day, the world doesn’t need more violence and vengeance.  We need more love and empathy.  When we strip away the politics, labels and perceptions, we are all human beings discovering what it means to live.

The following is an excellent article copy and pasted from NikkeiView.com:

Japan tsunami

I was shocked, saddened and depressed when I learned that there are people in the United States who think that the Tohoku Kanto Earthquake and subsequent tsunami, which has caused enormous damage and casualties that will surely top 10,000, is some sort of karmic payback for Japan’s bombing of Pearl Harbor. Really? Seriously?

Yes, unfortunately. Here’s just a sampling of some updates and comments from Facebook that rant about Pearl Harbor and the tsunami, and how the U.S shouldn’t send any aid to Japan:

Who bombed Pearl Harbor? Karmas a bitch.

Do I feel bad for japan? Two words….pearl harbor

Dear Japan, it’s not nice to be snuck up on by something you can’t do anything about, is it? Sincerely, Pearl Harbor.

screw japan they got what they dederve. any remember pearl horbor I do .they killed thousands of anericans and would do it again. kill em all let god sort emm out.

Now the people in japan know how we felt during pearl harbor when they made are man abd women float in the ocean…

Its god way of sayng theres too many chinese here imma take u out lol

If they didn’t bomb pearl harbor this wouldn’t have happened. Gods way of tell japanese people there gay

all yall remember pearl harbor when yall give money to japan

OMG!!! Im so sick of people “praying for Japan” :we should help” i don’t know wha happened in yall brain but they’re the same people that bombed Pearl Harbor! get it together mane, I have no sympathy for em, Tragic stuff happen every single day!!

Obama To Offer Assistance To Earthquake.. We have starving people in this country, people with housing /medical needs and other life substaining essentials yet USA runs to the rescue, who’s going to rescue us the overinflated porices does any 1 remember “PEARL HARBOR”??? AGAIN TAX PAYERS WILL END UP PAYING AT THE END OF THE DAY

I’m all for free speech and these people have a right to say what they think, even if it’s ignorant, misinformed and downright hateful. But these thoughts are worrisome because they seem so cavalier, so easy for these people to express.

Thankfully, there seems to be a backlash building of people on social networks (just search for “Pearl Harbor” on Twitter) raising a chorus of sentiment calling out these ignorant comments and saying, for instance, “If this Earthquake is Japan’s Karmatic punishment for Pearl Harbor, I dread to see what ours will be for Hiroshima and Nagasaki” and “Who ever said that the earthquake was karma for Pearl Harbor are morons. Obviously they forgot the US nuked 2 of their cities in retaliation.”

Some people who should know better because they’re public figures have made stupid pronouncements too. A WNBA superstar, Cappie Pondexter had to apologize for a pair of Tweets, “What if God was tired of the way they treated their own people in there own country! Idk guys he makes no mistakes” and “u just never knw! They did pearl harbor so u can’t expect anything less.” She later apologized.

Alex Sulkin, a writer and producer for the animated TV show “Family Guy” Tweeted, “If you want to feel better about this earthquake in Japan, google “Pearl Harbor death toll”. He also later apologized.

Gilbert Gottfried, a comedian whose raspy voice has been the quack of the Aflac duck for the insurance company’s US television commercials, made some insensitive jokes (12 of ‘em) on Twitter about the tsunami, and he was fired by the company.

Although she wasn’t a celebrity a few days ago, a student at UCLA, Alexandra Wallace has become something of a name for a really unfortunate anti-Asian video she posted to YouTube, “Asians in the Library,” in which she makes the mocking “ching-chong” phony Chinese sound and makes a comment about how Asians in the library are irritating her even if they’re getting news about their relatives “back home” after the tsunami.

What is it about this horrible disaster and the tragic aftermath — we’re on the brink of a nuclear meltdown, hello — that is bringing out such stupid reactions?

I’m most disturbed by the range of people spouting this garbage: Looking at their Facebook profile pictures I see young and old, white, black, Hispanic faces (no Asians, thankfully) and both men and women. One profile photo shows a smiling man holding a cute baby to his cheek. But the update next to his photo is anything but cute or smiling.

Years ago in the 1990s when I worked in Colorado Springs at the Gazette, I interviewed a veteran who survived Pearl Harbor and he kept saying “Japs” during the interview. He finally stopped, looked at me and said, “You know I don’t mean you, right?” If he’s still alive, I wonder if he would agree with the people who link the tsunami with Pearl Harbor.

For the record, here are some facts to counter some of the claims about Pearl Harbor, and other misinformation passed along in such comments:

Pearl Harbor attack, Dec. 7 1941Pearl Harbor suffered a terrible attack on Dec. 7, 1941, but it was an act of war, not an act of nature. The targets were military (not that that makes it less awful), and 2,402 men were killed and 1,282 wounded.

The U.S. declared war on Japan the next day, and towards the end of the war, had embarked on a firebombing campaign that killed more people than the two atomic bombs that forced Japan to surrender. On the night of March 9-10, 1945, 335 B-29 bombers flew over Tokyo and dropped around 1,700 tons of bombs. About 16 square miles of Tokyo was destroyed and well over 100,000 people (that’s a conservative estimate) died in the firestorm caused by the bombing.

The atomic bomb over Hiroshima killed about 90,000 instantly, and in Nagasaki, 70,000 were killed by the second A-bomb.

If people think the tsunami is some sort of payback, that’s some steep interest over the decades, because anyone would say that during the war, Japan paid the ultimate price for its aggression of the 1930s.

Some people are objecting to sending monetary or relief aid to Japan, claiming that Japan didn’t even help the United States after Katrina. That’s blatantly untrue, or terribly uninformed.

The Japanese Foreign Ministry announced it would provide $1 million in relief aid to Katrina victims, and the government also donated $200,000 to the Red Cross immediately following the hurricane. Private Japanese donors gave more than $1.5 million and Japanese companies with US operations gave $12 million towards Katrina relief.

What’s happening in Japan right now is a tragedy of worldwide proportions, and luckily, I think most people here in the U.S. and around the globe understand that and empathize with the plight of the Japanese. It’s just too bad that there are also those who think the Japanese people somehow had it coming to them.

Post submitted by Sahra

“And thereby hangs a tale”

IDIOM

MEANING:  An expression, taken from As You Like It by William Shakespeare, that means roughly “There’s a real story behind this.” It is commonly used by someone who is about to give the background of an interesting object, incident or idea: “The colonel remarked, ‘See that umbrella over the mantelpiece?  It saved my life during the way, and thereby hangs a tale.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 247 other followers